Let’s debunk some commonly spread myths and disinformation about the ESA voucher program:
The Claim: “The money follows the child.”
The Truth: Most of this $900 million is going to families who had already chosen private options. 3 in 4 applicants for ESA vouchers were already in private school or homeschool, and were not receiving state funding at all. Each of these students is an entirely new cost to taxpayers, and each ESA voucher represents a subtraction from the state budget used to fund public schools — with no identified revenue source for the state to cover those costs.
The Claim: “ESA vouchers save Arizona money.”
The Truth: Each ESA voucher costs Arizona money. Even a basic universal ESA voucher is $424 more than public schools get for each elementary and middle school student, and $540 more for each high schooler. The impact of this loss cannot be overstated: $900 million drained from public education means every one of Arizona’s public schools loses out on $300,000 in desperately needed dollars that will likely result in schools being forced to lay off teachers and slash suddenly unaffordable fixed costs such as broken-down A/C and buses. Supt. Horne says he is perfectly willing even to push for school closures.
The Claim: “Families are fleeing public schools.”
The Truth: Public school enrollment is steady. If universal ESA vouchers were causing students to leave public school en masse, we would expect to see a dramatic drop in enrollment — but the data simply does not back that up. A comparison of Arizona’s 2021-22 public school enrollment with 2022-23 enrollment shows very little change. The vast majority – 92% – of Arizona families choose public schools.
The Claim: “Parents are the accountability.”
The Truth: No accountability or transparency for taxpayers — or parents. Unlike the detailed accounting for public schools that accounts for every taxpayer dollar down to the last penny, ESA vouchers mean taxpayers have no way to know how their money is being spent, or what (or whether) children are learning. Voucher-funded private schools have no requirements for accreditation, registration, licensing, approval, teacher certification or special education, and are not required to assess or report academic achievement.
Home education spending is similarly lax; as long as an item can be tied to a “curriculum,” which is ill-defined and open to interpretation, it meets the definition of an allowable expense. The ESA voucher program doesn’t require parents to spend these tax dollars on core curriculum. Many parents are using their ESA vouchers for extravagant purchases like laptops, pricey espresso machines, and bounce houses. In February, the Arizona Department of Education boasted that they’d approved over 111,000 expenses in one day with no receipts, which assuming a full 24 hours of work, equals approximately 10 expenses every second. These approved expenditures are not available for public scrutiny.
The Claim: “Arizona will always fund education.”
The Truth: When times get tough, public schools see cuts first. Finding new revenue is a heavy political lift, especially in this toxic hyperpartisan environment: the Arizona Constitution requires a two-thirds supermajority vote from both chambers of the legislature to increase taxes. The only other solution is to cut spending. Last time the state had to come up with $900 million, despite massive public protest, lawmakers slashed funding for our public schools.